My resolution for 2010 was fairly simple; it was to not botch the launch of the Alex Van Helsing series, and since we make resolutions in January, I think at the time my only other resolution was to complete Alex Van Helsing: Voice of the Undead, which was due into the publisher.
This year it's the same. We have Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Years, and this is the period in which most of my writing on Alex Van Helsing: Book 3 gets written. That's coming along, and it's certainly slowing down my posts. But I wanted to post this-- the wonderful book blog Booklady has named Alex Van Helsing: Vampire Rising to her 2010 Top 10 YA reads of the year. I'm really touched!
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Joelle Anthony's 25 YA Cliches List
Joelle Anthony has re-posted her excellent list of the 25 Things Most Overused in Middle Grade and YA Fiction.
Some highlights:
-- and so on. I think it's important to note that you're free to use any of these cliches if we we feel you must. But knowing it's a cliche at least gives you two things-- a chance to be sure of the choice and put some spin on it, and a chance to toss the cliche and try something else.
By the way, the #2 item-- best friends with red hair? Guilty.
Some highlights:
#25 – Vegetarian teens with unsympathetic meat-eating parents
#24 – Shy or withdrawn characters that take refuge in the school’s art room/ compassionate art teachers
#23 – A token black friend among a group of white friends – usually it’s a girl, and she’s always gorgeous
Joelle Anthony
#22 – A tiny scar through the eyebrow, sometimes accompanied by an embarrassing story
-- and so on. I think it's important to note that you're free to use any of these cliches if we we feel you must. But knowing it's a cliche at least gives you two things-- a chance to be sure of the choice and put some spin on it, and a chance to toss the cliche and try something else.
By the way, the #2 item-- best friends with red hair? Guilty.
Friday, December 24, 2010
Review: Infected: Prey by Andrea Speed
Andrea Speed's Infected: Prey is a hard-boiled detective book with were-cats. It's very, wonderfully traditional in the detective-book sense, in that the lead, Roan McKichan, is a cynical ex-cop who will follow the clues wherever they lead, no matter what seediness he uncovers. Like most such detectives, Roan has the right to move through all worlds, from the cop world he used to inhabit, to the tony neighborhood where his new, wealthy clients yearn for the return of their missing son, to the dance clubs where most of the son's friends hang out. So it's a detective story-- the romance stems from a committed relationship Roan is in already. And oh yeah, Speed's world features a community (they don't like the word) of people who can change into cats. Oh, and oh yeah, Roan and partner Paris are gay. The book takes their relationship, and the various tensions and feelings of inadequacy between tough, jaded Roan and beautiful, funny Paris, seriously. But this is a detective book, not a romance, so if you're looking for erotica, this is not your book.
Andrea Speed's world of cat-people is riveting and full of detail. There are a couple of kinds of "Infected"-- those who are born with the cat virus, and those who catch it. The transformation of man into tiger, lion, or cougar is painful and wrenching, and some of Speed's best writing comes in the passages where Roan has to lock up his partner Paris so that Paris can spend an hour painfully changing, and then remain locked up. These are beautiful, heartfelt passages, and Speed is good at capturing the sensitivity in Roan, outwardly a constant wisenheimer. Speed has built her world out with all the rules it needs, down to laws to keep the Infected in check (they *have* to lock themselves up) to wacko churches that cater to teens who want to become infected. Neat stuff.
Infected: Prey as collected in paperback is actually two Perry-Mason-length novellas, which is nice, because you can read a whole story and then move the the next one. As I look at my shelf, the true hard-boiled detective stories, your Saints and Hammers and Marlowes, were thin and efficient volumes, and would have stayed that way if not for the dawn of enormous Patricia Cornwell-style mega-thrillers. Stories like this that focus on a private eye and the cast of characters that surround him fit the novella length perfectly and also fit perfectly into the rhythms of TV drama series, which INFECTED could easily be.
I enjoyed entering this world and can't wait to read more of it.
Andrea Speed's world of cat-people is riveting and full of detail. There are a couple of kinds of "Infected"-- those who are born with the cat virus, and those who catch it. The transformation of man into tiger, lion, or cougar is painful and wrenching, and some of Speed's best writing comes in the passages where Roan has to lock up his partner Paris so that Paris can spend an hour painfully changing, and then remain locked up. These are beautiful, heartfelt passages, and Speed is good at capturing the sensitivity in Roan, outwardly a constant wisenheimer. Speed has built her world out with all the rules it needs, down to laws to keep the Infected in check (they *have* to lock themselves up) to wacko churches that cater to teens who want to become infected. Neat stuff.
Infected: Prey as collected in paperback is actually two Perry-Mason-length novellas, which is nice, because you can read a whole story and then move the the next one. As I look at my shelf, the true hard-boiled detective stories, your Saints and Hammers and Marlowes, were thin and efficient volumes, and would have stayed that way if not for the dawn of enormous Patricia Cornwell-style mega-thrillers. Stories like this that focus on a private eye and the cast of characters that surround him fit the novella length perfectly and also fit perfectly into the rhythms of TV drama series, which INFECTED could easily be.
I enjoyed entering this world and can't wait to read more of it.
Thursday, December 23, 2010
New Interview at "From the Shadows"
I literally never get tired of answering questions about writing, so thank God someone is out there to ask. I just did an interview with the guys at From the Shadows and really enjoyed the questions. Some samples:
Check out the whole interview.
EJ: When did you begin writing?
Jason: I'm pretty sure this will be most author's answer, but very early. I remember starting to write short stories that were based on movies I'd seen-- like I wrote a story that was a sequel to War of the Gargantua, a Japanese movie about two giant, furry monsters. The first story I submitted was to Twilight Zone Magazine in about 1982 when I was 10, and it was about a robot who had been responsible for the sinking of the Titanic. If I recall correctly, it wasn't for them. :) I didn't publish any fiction until I was getting out of college....
EJ: Tell us why readers will enjoy your new release.
Jason: ALEX VAN HELSING: VAMPIRE RISING is the first in a series from HarperTeen about a teenager who learns that he can sense vampires and is recruited into a giant organization of vampire-hunters, the Polidorium. It's very heavy on action and close calls. This is very much James Bond with vampires. I just love writing them, especially because the world is one I created, where hundreds of years of vampire literature are all true. Book 1 came out this Summer and will come out in Paperback on the same day that Book 2, VOICE OF THE UNDEAD comes out in hardcover. If you have a young person in your life who wants more adventure with a paranormal twist, this is it for you.
Check out the whole interview.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
What If: Dark Reign out today!
Right at the edge of Christmas Eve, I'm spending most of my time trying to make use of vacation time to continue to chip away at Alex Van Helsing #3, but we have an announcement today. What If: Dark Reign: The Osborn Assassination is out today. I'm really excited by this because it's the first time I've gotten to write anything involving the Avengers, and in fact my whole love affair with comics started with a What If story way back in 1984 (What If Captain America Were Revived Today? by Peter B. Gillis and Sal Buscema. See Again with the Comics for a great write-up.)
What If: Dark Reign: The Osborn Assassination is the story of what happens when Hawkeye, a hero who has always pledged not to take life, made good on his threat to assassinate the evil Norman Osborn, the former supervillain who somehow managed to take over the United States security apparatus.
I love the art in this book from Sana Takeda-- see a preview from Comicbookresources.
The description:
What If: Dark Reign: The Osborn Assassination is the story of what happens when Hawkeye, a hero who has always pledged not to take life, made good on his threat to assassinate the evil Norman Osborn, the former supervillain who somehow managed to take over the United States security apparatus.
I love the art in this book from Sana Takeda-- see a preview from Comicbookresources.
The description:
Written by JASON HENDERSON Penciled by SANA TAKEDA Cover by MIKE DEODATO Back-Up Story By RICK REMENDER & SHAWN MOLL Before the events of Siege, long-time Avenger Clint Barton (aka Hawkeye) sought to take matters into his own hands and kill Norman Osborn himself. Why should a menace like Osborn be allowed the chance to live? Slay the monster, save the kingdom... right? The kill shot is just the beginning in this twisted tale of conspiracy and intrigue that takes Dark Reign to even blacker depths. What's the worst that could happen? See for yourself in this one-shot from Jason Henderson and Sana Takeda. PLUS, What If: The Venom Symbiote Possessed Deadpool - Part 1! 40 PGS./Rated T+ Cover price $3.99.
Friday, December 17, 2010
Process and Progress on Alex Van Helsing #3
The AVH Notebook (V. 2) |
For instance, you can't really see it but the header there says SECHERON DARK, with dramatic beats underneath, corresponding with the bits of action in the scene. This scene is in (currently) chapter 4 of the first draft. The notes say:
SECHERON DARK
Into town-- body armor
Police lights cutting through the dim-- people milling aboutThe Docks--
Army of vampires coming up from the water (L. Geneva)-- attackinga bony horse and the Skull LadyVampires with other skull faces covered-- attacking--ELLE!Alex saved by the GIRL"It's Claire."Claire sends a message
That's for a scene-- scenes need to have dramatic beats and its easiest to write them down. I continue this way, going from electronic to paper outline, throughout the first draft.
Meanwhile I had a quick call with my editor to pick her brain about what to do with some of the characters. A 10-minute call and we're out. The editor is warm but sharp and efficient. We bat some ideas rapid fire and settle on a direction, and each return to our lives.
And on we go. The book is currently 15,000 words into draft 1, and due in February.
Monday, December 13, 2010
Review: The Vampire Book, Third Edition
The Vampire Book: The Encyclopedia of the Undead is one of the most valuable books I use in the prep work I do. I've been using it for years-- the version I just got is the third edition, making this the second time that I'll be donating a dog-eared previous edition to the Outreach Center. (Note: I don't bother selling used books. I donate them. Goodwill, Outreach, Library, whatever. At the end the year you can write off some amount, and it's not as tiresome as waiting on a small sum in trade at the Half Price Books. Just donate them.)
The Vampire Book is over 800 pages of articles on all things related to vampires in folklore, pop art, history and culture. There are articles on everything from Dracula, the book, to Dracula, the 1979 movie, to Chelsea Quinn Yarbro and Buffy, the Vampire Slayer, to Twilight, with an individual article on Isabella Marie Swan.
I use this encyclopedia as a survey book to guide me to other sources because it's the most definitive and broad reference-- and certainly the most up to date-- that I know of. If you're looking for a massive brick of a book as a stocking stuffer for a vampire fan friend, The Vampire Book is the way to go.
The Vampire Book is over 800 pages of articles on all things related to vampires in folklore, pop art, history and culture. There are articles on everything from Dracula, the book, to Dracula, the 1979 movie, to Chelsea Quinn Yarbro and Buffy, the Vampire Slayer, to Twilight, with an individual article on Isabella Marie Swan.
Isabella gets her own article in the Third Edition. |
Thursday, December 9, 2010
Authors are product managers-- it's totally okay to act like it
We authors are writers first and product managers second. And it's a close second.
Saundra Mitchell has an excellent blog post on just how flibbertigibbet the publishing industry has gone over Amazon providing, in an easy little web tool, Nielsen Bookscan numbers. It's a limited exposure, of course-- authors can track their sales for the past four weeks, and get a handy graph of their amazon ranking for a much longer period. That's Bookscan sales-- meaning sales reported at brick-and-mortar stores with a few exceptions, sometimes big exceptions, such as e-books and direct sales to libraries, which can matter to those whose books are often found in schools.
This is all big news because it's traditionally fairly difficult for authors to get sales data. I don't actually think the data is shielded from authors for any dark purpose or to put the author in a lower position. I think the data has been hard to share because sharing sales data in the old days wasn't part of the system.
But the publishing industry in the past decade or so has changed drastically, and today authors are expected to do more than "just write." Today they are also expected to help market. We're expected not to compete with our publisher's marketing team but augment it. It's tough, and professional things generally are tough-- you the author have only yourself to promote, while your marketing department has a whole product line.
But one thing everyone can benefit from is data. If I have data, daily data, I can see what makes a difference. For instance the data I got from Amazon this morning tells me that my best sales in the past month have been in San Antonio-- which is also where I just did a lot of school visits. This kind of data helps us sell products and meet goals because it helps us try marketing techniques and discard or ramp up as needed.
But if the data isn't accurate, then let this just be the beginning. I think that authors and publishers should have regular sales meetings to review the numbers, and the author should have to come to the meeting with his own action plans for what he's going to do for his books. It's not about harassing the publisher.
The author is a product manager. He manages the lifecycle of his books, he judges new opportunities, he develops a strategy, and he begrudges every minute, every hour and every second that isn't contributing to the business.
I am thrilled at these new developments. Let the market come in.
Saundra Mitchell has an excellent blog post on just how flibbertigibbet the publishing industry has gone over Amazon providing, in an easy little web tool, Nielsen Bookscan numbers. It's a limited exposure, of course-- authors can track their sales for the past four weeks, and get a handy graph of their amazon ranking for a much longer period. That's Bookscan sales-- meaning sales reported at brick-and-mortar stores with a few exceptions, sometimes big exceptions, such as e-books and direct sales to libraries, which can matter to those whose books are often found in schools.
This is all big news because it's traditionally fairly difficult for authors to get sales data. I don't actually think the data is shielded from authors for any dark purpose or to put the author in a lower position. I think the data has been hard to share because sharing sales data in the old days wasn't part of the system.
But the publishing industry in the past decade or so has changed drastically, and today authors are expected to do more than "just write." Today they are also expected to help market. We're expected not to compete with our publisher's marketing team but augment it. It's tough, and professional things generally are tough-- you the author have only yourself to promote, while your marketing department has a whole product line.
But one thing everyone can benefit from is data. If I have data, daily data, I can see what makes a difference. For instance the data I got from Amazon this morning tells me that my best sales in the past month have been in San Antonio-- which is also where I just did a lot of school visits. This kind of data helps us sell products and meet goals because it helps us try marketing techniques and discard or ramp up as needed.
But if the data isn't accurate, then let this just be the beginning. I think that authors and publishers should have regular sales meetings to review the numbers, and the author should have to come to the meeting with his own action plans for what he's going to do for his books. It's not about harassing the publisher.
The author is a product manager. He manages the lifecycle of his books, he judges new opportunities, he develops a strategy, and he begrudges every minute, every hour and every second that isn't contributing to the business.
I am thrilled at these new developments. Let the market come in.
Give an Alex Van Helsing Shirt for Christmas!
I've added all kinds of things to a new, improved Alex Van Helsing Store. Check it out if you're looking for some cool stocking stuffers!
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Vampire of the Week #4: Pumpkin Vampire
I've posted a new Vampire of the Week. This week: The Serbian Pumpkin Vampire.
Want to see them all? You can find them on my video page, the jasonhenderson channel.
Want to see them all? You can find them on my video page, the jasonhenderson channel.
Monday, December 6, 2010
Stefan Petrucha on BLOOD PROPHESY, Vampires, and Barnabas Collins
I've admired Stefan Petrucha's writing for many years-- Petrucha is able to seamlessly weave stories that contemplate pop culture and deep thought together, such as in the first example I saw of his work, a legendary run of the X-Files comics. Petrucha is one of those writers who can take any assignment and hit it out of the park.
Anyway-- so I was thrilled to see that not only does Petrucha have a new vampire novel, Blood Prophecy, about a Puritan vampire trying to shed the curse, but he also has a new blog post (and book giveaway!) over at Fangtastic.
In this post, Petrucha neatly explores the vampire myth and hones in on Dark Shadows as a key moment in the evolution of all vampire literature.
Read the rest here.
Anyway-- so I was thrilled to see that not only does Petrucha have a new vampire novel, Blood Prophecy, about a Puritan vampire trying to shed the curse, but he also has a new blog post (and book giveaway!) over at Fangtastic.
In this post, Petrucha neatly explores the vampire myth and hones in on Dark Shadows as a key moment in the evolution of all vampire literature.
Barnabas was different. Rather than a soulless metaphor for disease and/or sex, he had a soul, and thanks to it, whined constantly. To be fair, Count Dracula, in Stoker’s novel, expresses sadness at not having seen the sun for a real long time, and there may be other precursors, but I’m convinced that it’s in Barnabas the notion of vampire as someone trapped reaches fruition. (The idea may seem a bit alien to fans of the 21st century glitter-vamps who sort-of don’t like the bloodlust thing and still attend high school. These days, more often than not, the punishment aspect of vampirism has been diluted to the point of meaninglessness.)
Read the rest here.
Sunday, December 5, 2010
Blood and Roses (1960)
Tonight I watched Blood and Roses on Netflix, a 1960 French film that, like Crypt of the Vampire and The Vampire Lovers is an adaptation of Sheridan LeFanu's Carmilla.
But O, what a difference-- Blood and Roses comes from Roger Vadim, and where Vampire Lovers was a gothic cheesecake film and Crypt was a spooky mood piece, Vadim's movie is a beautiful, haunting, genuinely well-made and often surreal vampire movie that focuses on a small cast and the forbidden loves between them.
In this version, Carmilla is possessed by a vampire who wants to possess the handsome Leopoldo, and she chooses the beautiful Mircalla, who is jealous of (but also a little infatuated with) the stunning Georgia, who luckily has the same jealous/not so jealous thing going on. There are fireworks, costume balls, explosions and even a caaaa-raaazy dream sequence that puts the foreign in foreign film.
You know how I often have to explain that a movie I'm watching has to be enjoyed in some removed or ironic fashion? This is not a movie like that-- it can be enjoyed as a prime piece of French New Wave.
Check out the slightly racy, very weird dream sequence here.
I cannot recommend this movie enough.
Here's a trailer:
If you wish to see the whole movie, you can just start watching it here:
But O, what a difference-- Blood and Roses comes from Roger Vadim, and where Vampire Lovers was a gothic cheesecake film and Crypt was a spooky mood piece, Vadim's movie is a beautiful, haunting, genuinely well-made and often surreal vampire movie that focuses on a small cast and the forbidden loves between them.
In this version, Carmilla is possessed by a vampire who wants to possess the handsome Leopoldo, and she chooses the beautiful Mircalla, who is jealous of (but also a little infatuated with) the stunning Georgia, who luckily has the same jealous/not so jealous thing going on. There are fireworks, costume balls, explosions and even a caaaa-raaazy dream sequence that puts the foreign in foreign film.
You know how I often have to explain that a movie I'm watching has to be enjoyed in some removed or ironic fashion? This is not a movie like that-- it can be enjoyed as a prime piece of French New Wave.
Check out the slightly racy, very weird dream sequence here.
I cannot recommend this movie enough.
Here's a trailer:
If you wish to see the whole movie, you can just start watching it here:
Saturday, December 4, 2010
Crypt of the Vampire
I've been busy working on Alex Van Helsing Book 3 (which is due to HarperCollins in February) but you can't work all the time. This week I caught Crypt of the Vampire, a 1964 adaptation of Carmilla starring Christopher Lee.
Note: It's strange to me how diverse our choices are today for rare video-- more than ever before you have a good shot at finding a movie you're looking for, but your choices will scattered everywhere. In the past couple of weeks I've gone different places for Crypt of the Vampire (Amazon Video on Demand), Blood & Roses (streaming on Netflix) and The Eyes of Laura Mars (last night on Verizon FiOS Video on Demand.)
But about Crypt of the Vampire. This is a version of Carmilla that adapts Sheridan LeFanu's original stories in different ways than I've seen before. In most adaptations (notably Hammer's Vampire Lovers)-- a seductive and well-born vampire called Carmilla Karnstein visits the young ingenue Laura, steadily seducing Laura before either triumphing with Laura as a new companion or failing when the supporting cast grows wise to Carmilla's antics and destroy her. Hammer got a whole cycle of films out of their "Karnstein Saga," and in fact LeFanu's plot is so well-constructed and full of intrigue that it has become a go-to blueprint for vampire movies.
There are some big differences in Crypt of the Vampire. There's no trailer I could find, but here's a Paul Hardcastle video that uses some great footage in time to the music. Check out especially the vampire/succubus floating out of the darkness at 5:34.
Here, the Karnsteins are the main characters, trying to outlive the curse of an evil Karnstein ancestor who was executed as a witch long ago. Christopher Lee plays the patriarch, doting on daughter Laura, who might have inherited the witchy curse. No sooner does Laura's nurse conduct a seance calling for help from what we might call the Old Powers, into their lives comes a stranger to become Laura's best pal and help her out of her doldrums. I can't for the life of me figure why all the characters have been thrown up in the air and switched around like this, but the skeleton of the tale is still Carmilla. I'd go deeper into the plot, but look: either you're the kind of person who likes to watch black-and-white public domain gothic horror movies or you're not, and my synopsis won't make any difference.
Besides, a synopsis would be tough. This is A-grade slow-moving gothic horror, and by that I mean a class of movies like Castle of Blood and Black Sunday that are all atmosphere and only tangential relation to sense. We have creepy castles and chanting witches, longing looks and weird dubbing (the movie is an Italian-Spanish co-production). One genuinely interestting element here was the fact that the vampire is able to move about as a sort of astral projection, leaving her body safely hidden away in a coffin (the better to keep it safe from staking).
I'm always at a loss when trying to explain these films. You don't watch a movie like Crypt of the Vampire the way you watch, say, Philadelphia. If it sounds from my description as though I didn't like it, that's not the case. I genuinely love them. They are an aesthetic; less like films and more like wallpaper, reflections of an imaginary, weirdly dubbed, foggy world.
Note: It's strange to me how diverse our choices are today for rare video-- more than ever before you have a good shot at finding a movie you're looking for, but your choices will scattered everywhere. In the past couple of weeks I've gone different places for Crypt of the Vampire (Amazon Video on Demand), Blood & Roses (streaming on Netflix) and The Eyes of Laura Mars (last night on Verizon FiOS Video on Demand.)
But about Crypt of the Vampire. This is a version of Carmilla that adapts Sheridan LeFanu's original stories in different ways than I've seen before. In most adaptations (notably Hammer's Vampire Lovers)-- a seductive and well-born vampire called Carmilla Karnstein visits the young ingenue Laura, steadily seducing Laura before either triumphing with Laura as a new companion or failing when the supporting cast grows wise to Carmilla's antics and destroy her. Hammer got a whole cycle of films out of their "Karnstein Saga," and in fact LeFanu's plot is so well-constructed and full of intrigue that it has become a go-to blueprint for vampire movies.
There are some big differences in Crypt of the Vampire. There's no trailer I could find, but here's a Paul Hardcastle video that uses some great footage in time to the music. Check out especially the vampire/succubus floating out of the darkness at 5:34.
Here, the Karnsteins are the main characters, trying to outlive the curse of an evil Karnstein ancestor who was executed as a witch long ago. Christopher Lee plays the patriarch, doting on daughter Laura, who might have inherited the witchy curse. No sooner does Laura's nurse conduct a seance calling for help from what we might call the Old Powers, into their lives comes a stranger to become Laura's best pal and help her out of her doldrums. I can't for the life of me figure why all the characters have been thrown up in the air and switched around like this, but the skeleton of the tale is still Carmilla. I'd go deeper into the plot, but look: either you're the kind of person who likes to watch black-and-white public domain gothic horror movies or you're not, and my synopsis won't make any difference.
Besides, a synopsis would be tough. This is A-grade slow-moving gothic horror, and by that I mean a class of movies like Castle of Blood and Black Sunday that are all atmosphere and only tangential relation to sense. We have creepy castles and chanting witches, longing looks and weird dubbing (the movie is an Italian-Spanish co-production). One genuinely interestting element here was the fact that the vampire is able to move about as a sort of astral projection, leaving her body safely hidden away in a coffin (the better to keep it safe from staking).
I'm always at a loss when trying to explain these films. You don't watch a movie like Crypt of the Vampire the way you watch, say, Philadelphia. If it sounds from my description as though I didn't like it, that's not the case. I genuinely love them. They are an aesthetic; less like films and more like wallpaper, reflections of an imaginary, weirdly dubbed, foggy world.
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Line Editing: How the Editor Re-Reads Your Book
Brook Arden has a great post on line editing at her blog-- check it out if you want to know how one editor delves deeply into a book. This stuff is endlessly fascinating to me.
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Vampire of the Week #3: The Kappa, Lovable Turtle Vampire
This week's look at a vampire from around the world: Japan's Kappa, the lovable turtle vampire.
Monday, November 29, 2010
So you want? (#pubtips)
You may have seen the video called "So You Want to Write a Novel" that has been making the rounds. It is funny-- I've pasted it below if you haven't seen it. And it's easy to laugh at this guy, the imaginary wannabe writer with his nonsensical requests (Do you want to be a ghostwriter? I'm not a very good speller.) To me what's most telling about this person is his notion that writing is easy. It's easy to laugh at this.
And yet, and yet. I worry about this stuff, because I see a lot on the web that sort of divides the reasonable writer with reasonable goals from the idiots, and whattayaknow, the writer making the post is always on the side of reasonable. I'd like to throw out a few of my own pointers for writers:
You don't have to tamp down your expectations. I hear this all the time: don't expect to be a bestseller. Don't expect to make a lot of money. Don't expect that you'll get any reward from writing other than the satisfaction of a job well done. Actually, I'd back off the expectation of satisfaction as well.
Jeez, guys-- what kind of business people are we if we blithely expect to fail? This is terrible advice. I get that we want to keep writers from having unrealistic expectations, but I guarantee you that expecting failure guarantees it. Expecting no money guarantees it. Expecting no readers guarantees it.
Write your ass off. Finish the work. Make it awesome. Sell it. Do as much marketing as you can, as though you were opening a restaurant and you'll starve if it doesn't go. Expect big things. Don't be a jerk, and keep writing your ass off.
I've been writing professionally for about 17 years. In every single project I simultaneously carry two thoughts: this is genius and this is garbage. The first is what keeps you going, because guess what, no one else will be your advocate. No one else has to. Even your agent has other clients. You-- only you-- are the one to believe in you. You have to believe in you more than anyone else. The second thought (this is garbage) keeps you working your ass off.
Funny video, though.
And yet, and yet. I worry about this stuff, because I see a lot on the web that sort of divides the reasonable writer with reasonable goals from the idiots, and whattayaknow, the writer making the post is always on the side of reasonable. I'd like to throw out a few of my own pointers for writers:
You don't have to tamp down your expectations. I hear this all the time: don't expect to be a bestseller. Don't expect to make a lot of money. Don't expect that you'll get any reward from writing other than the satisfaction of a job well done. Actually, I'd back off the expectation of satisfaction as well.
Jeez, guys-- what kind of business people are we if we blithely expect to fail? This is terrible advice. I get that we want to keep writers from having unrealistic expectations, but I guarantee you that expecting failure guarantees it. Expecting no money guarantees it. Expecting no readers guarantees it.
Write your ass off. Finish the work. Make it awesome. Sell it. Do as much marketing as you can, as though you were opening a restaurant and you'll starve if it doesn't go. Expect big things. Don't be a jerk, and keep writing your ass off.
I've been writing professionally for about 17 years. In every single project I simultaneously carry two thoughts: this is genius and this is garbage. The first is what keeps you going, because guess what, no one else will be your advocate. No one else has to. Even your agent has other clients. You-- only you-- are the one to believe in you. You have to believe in you more than anyone else. The second thought (this is garbage) keeps you working your ass off.
Funny video, though.
Leslie Nielsen's Last Word (And Funniest Quotes)
RIP Leslie Nielsen, February 11, 1926 – November 28, 2010. I wanted to post a wonderful moment in Nielsen's Dracula: Dead and Loving It.
Also, Funny or Die was good enough to run a list of Nielsen's funniest lines-- reprinted below. Thanks, Leslie.
Also, Funny or Die was good enough to run a list of Nielsen's funniest lines-- reprinted below. Thanks, Leslie.
Airplane!:
Ted Striker: Surely you can't be serious.Rumack: I am serious... and don't call me Shirley.
Rumack: Captain, how soon can you land?Captain Oveur: I can't tell.Rumack: You can tell me. I'm a doctor.
Captain Oveur: No. I mean I'm just not sure.Rumack: Well, can't you take a guess?Captain Oveur: Well, not for another two hours.Rumack: You can't take a guess for another two hours?
Rumack: What was it we had for dinner tonight?
Elaine: Well, we had a choice of steak or fish.Rumack: Yes, yes, I remember. I had lasagna.
Rumack: You'd better tell the Captain we've got to land as soon as we can. This woman has to be gotten to a hospital.Elaine Dickinson: A hospital? What is it?Rumack: It's a big building with patients, but that's not important right now.
Police Squad!:
Dutch Gunderson: Who are you and how did you get in here?Frank: I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.
Frank: We're sorry to bother you at such a time like this, Mrs. Twice. We would have come earlier, but your husband wasn't dead then
Frank: Is there a ransom note?Ed: Yes, the butler found it; it was tied to this window and thrown into the rock garden. I sent the note to the lab; they're demanding one million dollars.Frank: Why would the lab demand a million dollars?
Frank: Well, you take a big chance getting up in the morning, crossing the street, or sticking your face in a fan.
The Naked Gun movies:
Frank: I'm Lt. Frank Drebin! Police Squad! And don't ever let me catch you guys in America
Frank: Wilma, I promise you; whatever scum did this, not one man on this force will rest one minute until he's behind bars. Now, let's grab a bite to eat.
Jane: Would you like a nightcap?Frank: No, thank you, I don't wear them.
Ed: You want to take a dinghy?Frank: No, I took care of that at the press conference.
Frank: It's the same old story. Boy finds girl, boy loses girl, girl finds boy, boy forgets girl, boy remembers girl, girls dies in a tragic blimp accident over the Orange Bowl on New Year's Day.Jane: Goodyear?Frank: No, the worst.
Frank: I'd known her for years. We used to go to all the police functions together. Ah, how I loved her, but she had her music. I think she had her music. She'd hang out with the Chicago Male Chorus and Symphony. I don't recall her playing an instrument or being able to carry a tune. Yet she was on the road 300 days of the year. In fact, I bought her a harp for Christmas. She asked me what it was
Frank: Now, Jane, what can you tell us about the man you saw last night?Jane: He's Caucasian.Ed: Caucasian?Jane: Yeah, you know, a white guy. A moustache. About six-foot-three.Frank: Awfully big moustache.
Frank: This is Frank Drebin, Police Squad. Throw down your guns, and come on out with your hands up. Or come on out, then throw down your guns, whichever way you wanna do it. Just remember the two key elements here: one, guns to be thrown down; two, come on out!
Hapsburg: I don't recall your name on the guest list.Frank: That's OK. I sometimes go by my maiden name.
Lt. Frank Drebin: Oh, that would be me. I've been swimming in raw sewage. I love it!
Quentin Hapsburg: Que sera sera... You do speak French, don't you?Lt. Frank Drebin: Unfortunately no, but I do kiss that way.
Frank: Like a midget at a urinal, I was going to have to stay on my toes.
Frank: Like a blind man at an orgy, I was going to have to feel my way through.
Ed Hocken: You might end up dead!Frank: "You might end up dead" is my middle name.Ed Hocken: What about Jane?Frank: I don't know her middle name.
Ed Hocken: We heard about you and Jane.Frank: Jane, Jane. That name will always remind me of her.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
If Buffy Minus Whedon is Bad, You Will Never Remember It
I've been reading the coverage (it crops up and dies down, and has been for the past year) of a refreshed Buffy, The Vampire Slayer produced by people involved in the original movie. Which is to say, the Buffy reboot would be a remake of the film without any of the characters or concepts that Joss Whedon and company attached to the television series in its seven year run.
If you never watched the tv series Buffy, what's at issue here is that while the movie was a vampires-in-high-school farce adventure, the TV series was a West Wing-funny, long-running, fantasy soap opera parody. They were utterly different in tone, and the TV version was successful whereas the film was not, and everyone seems confident that what made the difference was the iron-fisted creative control of creator Joss Whedon, whose unique voice permeated the show. Not so the film, where Whedon was but one voice. Point, Whedon and seven years.
My first instinct to the idea of a reboot without Whedon is: bleah. AKA Casino Royale, and not the fantastic James Bond reboot starring Daniel Craig, but the bizarre 1967 failure that happened because a group of creatives (we use that term even when it doesn't fit) had the rights to make a James Bond feature outside of the popular cycle. Remember this one? No?
So the most likely result here? Yes, they make a Buffy reboot without Joss Whedon, and it slips instantly into oblivion next to 1997's The Saint and all those Star Trek stories written after Gene Roddenberry died. Oh, wait, that one doesn't count.
And while we're at it, having the original creator onboard doesn't always help; witness Dan Curtis' own short-lived reboot of Dark Shadows in the 90s-- which I haven't seen. Maybe it was brilliant but didn't catch on.
Which is to say, who the heck knows if a Buffy remake would be any good? My personal feeling is still this: why again haven't the producers simply offered Joss Whedon boatloads of currency to write and produce their Buffy for them? Wouldn't that be the most logical way to proceed?
But if that doesn't happen, rest assured that if the reboot isn't any good, you'll never remember it.
If you never watched the tv series Buffy, what's at issue here is that while the movie was a vampires-in-high-school farce adventure, the TV series was a West Wing-funny, long-running, fantasy soap opera parody. They were utterly different in tone, and the TV version was successful whereas the film was not, and everyone seems confident that what made the difference was the iron-fisted creative control of creator Joss Whedon, whose unique voice permeated the show. Not so the film, where Whedon was but one voice. Point, Whedon and seven years.
My first instinct to the idea of a reboot without Whedon is: bleah. AKA Casino Royale, and not the fantastic James Bond reboot starring Daniel Craig, but the bizarre 1967 failure that happened because a group of creatives (we use that term even when it doesn't fit) had the rights to make a James Bond feature outside of the popular cycle. Remember this one? No?
So the most likely result here? Yes, they make a Buffy reboot without Joss Whedon, and it slips instantly into oblivion next to 1997's The Saint and all those Star Trek stories written after Gene Roddenberry died. Oh, wait, that one doesn't count.
And while we're at it, having the original creator onboard doesn't always help; witness Dan Curtis' own short-lived reboot of Dark Shadows in the 90s-- which I haven't seen. Maybe it was brilliant but didn't catch on.
Which is to say, who the heck knows if a Buffy remake would be any good? My personal feeling is still this: why again haven't the producers simply offered Joss Whedon boatloads of currency to write and produce their Buffy for them? Wouldn't that be the most logical way to proceed?
But if that doesn't happen, rest assured that if the reboot isn't any good, you'll never remember it.
Monday, November 22, 2010
Beware the Turkey Vampire (Vampire of the Week #2, Thanksgiving Edition, from Alex Van Helsing))
This week's look at a vampire from around the world: the Aztec turkey vampire, the Tlaciques.
Sunday, November 21, 2010
TXLA Lone Star Amazon List
For those shopping for a middle grade reader, here's a single Amazon list of all 20 books on the TXLA Lone Star Reading List. Pass it on!
2011 Texas Lone Star Reading List at Amazon
On the list this year:
2011 Texas Lone Star Reading List at Amazon
On the list this year:
- Bacigalupi, Paolo. Ship Breaker. Little, Brown, 2010.
- Bell, Cathleen Davitt. Little Blog on the Prairie. Bloomsbury, 2010.
- Brande, Robin. Fat Cat. Knopf, 2009.
- Carter, Ally. Heist Society. Disney Hyperion, 2010.
- Childs, Tera Lynn. Forgive My Fins. Katherine Tegen Books, 2010.
- Condie, Ally. Matched. Dutton, 2010.
- Deuker, Carl. Payback Time. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2010.
- Dionne, Erin. The Total Tragedy of a Girl Named Hamlet. Dial Books, 2010.
- Falkner, Brian. Brain Jack. Random House, 2009.
- Fisher, Catherine. Incarceron. Dial Books, 2010.
- Gephart, Donna. How to Survive Middle School. Delacorte, 2010.
- Golding, Julia. Dragonfly. Marshall Cavendish, 2009.
- Henderson, Jason. Vampire Rising. HarperTeen, 2010.
- Klass, David. Stuck on Earth. Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2010.
- Shulman, Polly. The Grimm Legacy. Putnam, 2010.
- Shusterman, Neal. Bruiser. HarperTeen, 2010.
- Sonnenblick, Jordan. After Ever After. Scholastic Press, 2010.
- Stork, Francisco X. The Last Summer of the Death Warriors. Arthur A. Levine Books, 2010.
- Wiles, Deborah. Countdown. Scholastic Press, 2010.
- Yancey, Richard. The Monstrumologist. Simon & Schuster, 2009.
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Vampire of the Week #1: The Chonchon
This week's look at a vampire from around the world from the guy who knows: Alex Van Helsing.
This week: Chile's Chonchon, the head with wings.
This week: Chile's Chonchon, the head with wings.
Friday, November 19, 2010
Alex Van Helsing Web Game: Classic Vampire Target Practice!
A way to pass the time while I write the next Alex Van Helsing. If you like this, maybe I can add more classic vampires.
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Night of Dark Shadows: Creepy, Moody Horror
"Mrs. Collins? Did you ever stop to think that perhaps you don't belong here?
Early on in the 1971 film Night of Dark Shadows, a writer looks out the window of a stately New England mansion and sees thickly gray skies and leaves so deep they seem an ocean. For a moment he sees someone hanging from the branches of a gnarled old tree, and then the vision is gone.
I have no history with Dark Shadows. I just discovered the series a few weeks ago (incredibly, given the prominence of it) and found myself entranced by the gothic soap opera, the great houses and endless hints at something darker beneath the surface of the characters' lives. The soap opera thrived on stretching stories out forever. The first movie, House of Dark Shadows, compressed the storyline of vampire Barnabas Collins down to one feature-length drama.
The second Dark Shadows movie, Night of Dark Shadows, is a different and better film than House of Dark Shadows. House was intended to appeal to fans of the series and worked to present the show's most popular storylines. By the second movie, the show had been canceled and the original cast had moved on. As a result, creator Dan Curtis chose to tell an all-new story of Collinwood Mansion. I think the result is a better, creepier, and more evocative horror tale.
Here, Quentin Collins inherits and returns with his new bride to his family's maginificent New England estate, Collinwood. Immediately he begins to experience ghostly visions: the hanging, old funerals, rainy processions.
Night of Dark Shadows is the perfect brandy-and-blanket movie.Everything about it evokes something cold and deep, even before the spirits arrive on the scene to interrupt the creepy piano score and gorgeous upstate New York setting. And they do appear, but this is more a witch-and-ghost movie than a vampire film.
The visions Quentin suffers are sometimes genuinely chilling, such as the sudden vision of a screaming child in a window. The movie treads along at a slow pace, like all gothics must. It is all about evoking a feeling of unease, of suspected betrayal and doom.
Mind you, this is not the sort of thing I write. I write books that start with people falling out of airplanes and ends with them stealing speedboats, and there is generally some kind of deathtrap in every chapter. I write action or action horror, depending on your preferred word. But I am haunted by the gothic, with its hidden corridors and hints of old wounds and old curses, and cold November days.
Beautiful work.
Trailer (this is a trailer for both movies; the trailer for Night of Dark Shadows starts at 2:40.)
Early on in the 1971 film Night of Dark Shadows, a writer looks out the window of a stately New England mansion and sees thickly gray skies and leaves so deep they seem an ocean. For a moment he sees someone hanging from the branches of a gnarled old tree, and then the vision is gone.
I have no history with Dark Shadows. I just discovered the series a few weeks ago (incredibly, given the prominence of it) and found myself entranced by the gothic soap opera, the great houses and endless hints at something darker beneath the surface of the characters' lives. The soap opera thrived on stretching stories out forever. The first movie, House of Dark Shadows, compressed the storyline of vampire Barnabas Collins down to one feature-length drama.
The second Dark Shadows movie, Night of Dark Shadows, is a different and better film than House of Dark Shadows. House was intended to appeal to fans of the series and worked to present the show's most popular storylines. By the second movie, the show had been canceled and the original cast had moved on. As a result, creator Dan Curtis chose to tell an all-new story of Collinwood Mansion. I think the result is a better, creepier, and more evocative horror tale.
Here, Quentin Collins inherits and returns with his new bride to his family's maginificent New England estate, Collinwood. Immediately he begins to experience ghostly visions: the hanging, old funerals, rainy processions.
Night of Dark Shadows is the perfect brandy-and-blanket movie.Everything about it evokes something cold and deep, even before the spirits arrive on the scene to interrupt the creepy piano score and gorgeous upstate New York setting. And they do appear, but this is more a witch-and-ghost movie than a vampire film.
The visions Quentin suffers are sometimes genuinely chilling, such as the sudden vision of a screaming child in a window. The movie treads along at a slow pace, like all gothics must. It is all about evoking a feeling of unease, of suspected betrayal and doom.
Mind you, this is not the sort of thing I write. I write books that start with people falling out of airplanes and ends with them stealing speedboats, and there is generally some kind of deathtrap in every chapter. I write action or action horror, depending on your preferred word. But I am haunted by the gothic, with its hidden corridors and hints of old wounds and old curses, and cold November days.
Beautiful work.
Trailer (this is a trailer for both movies; the trailer for Night of Dark Shadows starts at 2:40.)
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
"Gotham City 14 Miles" Review
If you're a Batman fan, I totally recommend checking out Gotham City 14 Miles, a searching and multi-faceted collection of essays on the Batman TV show. Writers as diverse as Paul Dini, Jeff Rovin and Chuck Dixon check in with chapters covering what made the show different, what made it a hit, why we still remember it (and even judge other Batman versions by it) and why many fans have a distince love-hate relationship with it.
I think I enjoyed Dixon's essay most of all; the comic writer discusses how he tried to add back tips of the hat to the TV show in his comics writing-- and also dishes on just how hard it is to write a Riddler script.
Comics-to-screen afficianados should check this one out!
I think I enjoyed Dixon's essay most of all; the comic writer discusses how he tried to add back tips of the hat to the TV show in his comics writing-- and also dishes on just how hard it is to write a Riddler script.
Comics-to-screen afficianados should check this one out!
Alex Van Helsing: Vampire Rising on 2011 Lone Star Reading List!
Guys! Alex Van Helsing: Vampire Rising has been added to the Texas Library Association's 2011 Lone Star Reading List. This is a big deal: the selection committee looks at all the books published over the year and chooses 20-- TWENTY!-- to recommend to Texas Middle Grade readers. This is a HUGE honor for this work.
Huge! This is a book with vampires and motorcycles. The kind of thing I wanted to read!
So: thank you genuinely and profoundly, selection committee. You are all friends and I deeply hope you know how thankful I am. I hope to see you all out there in the libraries.
Huge! This is a book with vampires and motorcycles. The kind of thing I wanted to read!
So: thank you genuinely and profoundly, selection committee. You are all friends and I deeply hope you know how thankful I am. I hope to see you all out there in the libraries.
Saturday, November 13, 2010
Alex Van Helsing Makes Vampire Killing Needlessly Complicated
Two random computer people explain Alex Van Helsing for you:
Friday, November 12, 2010
Coolness: BitDefender "Win a Trip to Transylvania" Speepstakes
Virus-scan software BitDefender is offering one of the coolest sweepstakes ever: Grand Prize is a trip to the company's Romanian lab and what the company is calling "Dracula's Caste." (Which Dracula's castle this would be, I have no idea-- still, how cool would that be?)
The notice from BitDefender says:
To enter, visit the BitDefender Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/ BitDefenderGlobal/ 120189635022?ref=ts and click on the Sweepstakes tab.
The notice from BitDefender says:
When it comes to digital security threats such as computer viruses, ID-Theft, or cyber criminals BitDefender says “Bring It On”. We invite you, your readers, your friends and your family to join us in the fight against online threats by participating in our “Bring It On” Sweepstakes for a chance to win our award winning BitDefender 2011 software and other great prizes such as:
--Grand Prize: 4-night/5-day Trip for two (2) to Dracula’s Castle in Bucharest, Romania
--Monthly Prize: Apple iPad 16GB
--Weekly Prizes: BitDefender 2011 software with a bundle of three (3) software products/services: Registry Booster, Password Manager and Privacy Armor
To enter, visit the BitDefender Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/
Outstanding self-editing tips from Aimee Salter
I love reading about writing-- at least the nuts-and-bolts stuff on writing, on the craft, the trade, the way we choose and use words and why who buys what. All that.
The soft-focus stuff about why we write somehow escapes me; I feel better when I write and worse when I don't, and the rest is blather. But I love practical advice that improves my actual writing, so I read a lot of books and articles about the craft. I've mentioned Stephen King's On Writing, but of course I also love Card's How to Write Fantasy & Science Fiction, Syd Field's Four Screenplays, Dibell's Plot, and too many more.
A lot of these books even contradict one another: write with an outline, or just go? Bounce ideas off friends or work in secrecy? Edit now or write something else first? Of course they contradict one another. This is an art. You get better by studying and practicing, but there is no perfect.
I just found a blog that I absolutely love from Aimee Salter that is full of practical, useful, hammer-and-nail writing advice. Salter specializes in advice that helps you eyeball your own work for obvious pitfalls:
Now of course, you could read that and say, but my sentence really needs a "was", and maybe it does. But these are tools to help get rid of the rest, and set those sentences apart.
I have been writing for a long time, and I feel that only in the past few years have I gotten my legs under me. Exposure to tools like Ms. Salter teaches would probably have helped me, if I had sought them out and had the sense to use them. Check out her Self-Editing Tips and Tricks blog!
The soft-focus stuff about why we write somehow escapes me; I feel better when I write and worse when I don't, and the rest is blather. But I love practical advice that improves my actual writing, so I read a lot of books and articles about the craft. I've mentioned Stephen King's On Writing, but of course I also love Card's How to Write Fantasy & Science Fiction, Syd Field's Four Screenplays, Dibell's Plot, and too many more.
A lot of these books even contradict one another: write with an outline, or just go? Bounce ideas off friends or work in secrecy? Edit now or write something else first? Of course they contradict one another. This is an art. You get better by studying and practicing, but there is no perfect.
I just found a blog that I absolutely love from Aimee Salter that is full of practical, useful, hammer-and-nail writing advice. Salter specializes in advice that helps you eyeball your own work for obvious pitfalls:
Seek and Destroy "was"
I've left this one until last because when you go through your manuscript searching for 'was', prepare to be there for a while. And each replace will be a little more involved. In most cases you won't be able to simply delete 'was' because you'll have to change the tense of words around it. But the seemingly endless task is worth it.
In most cases, the change is simple: "I was leaning on the windowsill." becomes "I leaned on the windowsill." Or, "I was faced by half a dozen upper-class snobs." becomes "I faced half a dozen upper-class snobs."
See the difference?
Now of course, you could read that and say, but my sentence really needs a "was", and maybe it does. But these are tools to help get rid of the rest, and set those sentences apart.
I have been writing for a long time, and I feel that only in the past few years have I gotten my legs under me. Exposure to tools like Ms. Salter teaches would probably have helped me, if I had sought them out and had the sense to use them. Check out her Self-Editing Tips and Tricks blog!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)